Subject:
Re:IRGN1553_UNCv40_Directions_Draft
From:
<satoshi.yamamoto.yd@hitachi.com>
Date:
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:03:25 +0900
To:
<chenzh-zhuang@163.com>
CC:
<yangxru@yahho.com.cn>, <sylaw47@gmail.com>, <gimgs0@hanmail.net>, <bear@sinica.edu.tw>, <selena@cmex.org.tw>, <jenkins@apple.com>, <ntviet@gmail.com>, <saqm@co.chesin.com>, <pic@co.chesin.com>, <peter_wh_cheng@csb.gov.hk>, <rkfyan@ogcio.gov.hk>, <rkfyan@gmail.com>, <xiaomwang2006@163.com>, <csluqin@comp.polyu.edu.hk>

Dear Mr. Chen, Editors,

Just minor comments for clarification 

#102 reference should be N1495 not N1525
#200 reference should be N1495 not N1525
#249 move to m set "without changing radical"

For the questionable u-source characters(#069 and #111), Japan'd like to suggest
UTC to withdraw for future discussion if IRG will submit UNC to the next WG2 
as resolved. I think UTC expressed at the last meeting to provide some evidences
/explanations on these characters but we don't have yet.

Thanks.

--
YAMAMOTO Satoshi   mailto:satoshi.yamamoto.yd@hitachi.com
Product Planning Dept., Hitachi, Ltd., Software Division



> >Dear colleagues,
> > 
> >Please find the attached UNCv40 directions (draft). I'm not sure the decisions of 2 U-source characters and 1 J-source characters (marked in red in excel file), can anyone remind me? Thanks.
> > 
> >By the way, please remember to povide your UNC TTF with the temp code points set by the Ms. Wang Xiaoming. Thanks.
> > 
> >Chen Zhuang
> >