Subject:
UCV: Unifiable Component Variations --> Unifiable Calligraphic Variants
From:
"김_경석-KIM_K" <gimgs0@hanmail.net>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:58:47 +0900 (KST)
To:
<bear@sinica.edu.tw>
CC:
<satoshi.yamamoto.yd@hitachi.com>, "'川幡 太一 '" <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>, <chenzh-zhuang@163.com>, <selena@cmex.org.tw>, <jenkins@apple.com>, <ntviet@gmail.com>, <peter_wh_cheng@csb.gov.hk>, <rkfyan@ogcio.gov.hk>, <xiaomwang2006@163.com>, <csluqin@comp.polyu.edu.hk>, <mykang@mct.go.kr>, <john.knightley@gmail.com>, <gimgs0@hanmail.net>

 

Subject: UCV: Unifiable Component Variations --> Unifiable Calligraphic Variants

 

Hi, everybody.

 

- At first, UCV was an acronym for "Unifiable Component Variations".

Later, at the resolution document of IRG #31 meeting,

UCV became to mean "Unifiable Calligraphic Variants"

 

- I would like to comment on using the term "Calligraphic".

As I understand it, the term calligraphic refers to writing with a brush and, therefore,

seems to imply that the variants are due to calligraphic differences.

 

- I wonder if variants are just due to calligraphic differences.

How about printing (or font) differences? (Please correct me if I am wrong.)

 

- The term calligraphic seems somewhat confusing or misleading (at least to me ^-^).

 

I would like to hear your opinions.

 

Thanks. in advance.

 

KIM, K.



김 경석, KIM Kyongsok (GIM G)
gimgs0@hanmail.net

[한메일 Express]다양한 계정 관리를 한방에! 정미섭님이 쓰는 법!