Subject:
RE: Unifiable Component Variations --> Unifiable Calligraphic Variants
From:
"Bear Tseng" <bear@sinica.edu.tw>
Date:
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:40:20 +0800
To:
'김_경석-KIM_K' <gimgs0@hanmail.net>
CC:
<satoshi.yamamoto.yd@hitachi.com>, '川幡 太一 ' <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>, <chenzh-zhuang@163.com>, <selena@cmex.org.tw>, <jenkins@apple.com>, <ntviet@gmail.com>, <peter_wh_cheng@csb.gov.hk>, <rkfyan@ogcio.gov.hk>, <xiaomwang2006@163.com>, <csluqin@comp.polyu.edu.hk>, <mykang@mct.go.kr>, <john.knightley@gmail.com>, "Bear Tseng" <beartsn@gmail.com>

Dear colleagues,

 

Do you think the term “Calligraphic Variations” could be referred to as the term “異寫字” which may be defined in “漢語大字典”? (Dear Chen Zhuang, how do you think?)

 

If so, I don’t think that the “Unifiable Calligraphic Variants (UCV)” is a suitable term in the resolution M31.6.  And then I agree with Prof. Kim’s opinion, i.e., UCV is for “Unifiable Component Variations” rather than “Unifiable Calligraphic Variations”.

 

Best regards,

 

Bear

"Doing everything always does nothing" Bear said.

http://idv.sinica.edu.tw/bear/

http://blog.udn.com/beartseng

From: 김_경석-KIM_K [mailto:gimgs0@hanmail.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:59 AM
To: bear@sinica.edu.tw
Cc: satoshi.yamamoto.yd@hitachi.com; '川幡 太一 '; chenzh-zhuang@163.com; selena@cmex.org.tw; jenkins@apple.com; ntviet@gmail.com; peter_wh_cheng@csb.gov.hk; rkfyan@ogcio.gov.hk; xiaomwang2006@163.com; csluqin@comp.polyu.edu.hk; mykang@mct.go.kr; john.knightley@gmail.com; gimgs0@hanmail.net
Subject: UCV: Unifiable Component Variations --> Unifiable Calligraphic Variants

 

 

Subject: UCV: Unifiable Component Variations --> Unifiable Calligraphic Variants

 

Hi, everybody.

 

- At first, UCV was an acronym for "Unifiable Component Variations".

Later, at the resolution document of IRG #31 meeting,

UCV became to mean "Unifiable Calligraphic Variants"

 

- I would like to comment on using the term "Calligraphic".

As I understand it, the term calligraphic refers to writing with a brush and, therefore,

seems to imply that the variants are due to calligraphic differences.

 

- I wonder if variants are just due to calligraphic differences.

How about printing (or font) differences? (Please correct me if I am wrong.)

 

- The term calligraphic seems somewhat confusing or misleading (at least to me ^-^).

 

I would like to hear your opinions.

 

Thanks. in advance.

 

KIM, K.

 



김 경석, KIM Kyongsok (GIM G)
gimgs0@hanmail.net

[한메일 Express]다양한 계정 관리를 한방에! 정미섭님이 쓰는 법!